And then we all put pantyhose on our heads and stuck up a 7-11!

Let's just acknowledge from the outset that THE EMPEROR IS WANDERING AROUND ORANGEASS NAKED. There is no strategy. No nine-dimensional chess. No secret plan to own the libs. There's just a bunch of bumbling old fools, arrogant enough to think they can beat Robert Mueller by WINGIN' IT!

For the record, we're pretty sure Rudy Giuliani was just making shit up last night on Hannity. "When I saw that $35,000 retainer, I said to myself ..." is not a part of any legal strategy. It's ranting. But as usual, Trumpland is spending the morning furiously shouting, WE MEANT TO SAY THAT! LUV 2 OWN THE LIBS BY CONFESSING 2 CRIMES ON NATIONAL TELEVISION!

Okay, have it your way. Let's pretend for a minute that everything Rudy said last night and this morning was 100 percent true. FINE.

What's that thing where you fire someone to interfere with an ongoing criminal investigation?

He fired Comey because Comey would not, among other things, say that he wasn't a target of the investigation.

And then Trump got Rod Rosenstein to dummy up a memo saying Comey was You're Fired because he was mean to Hillary Clinton. After which he lied about it for months. Because there was no obstruction of justice and NO COLLUSION.

Sounds legit!

Three impossible things before breakfast!

We've fed the transcripts through Google's Wingloon Translator app, and we think we've worked out Rudy's version of the story:

In the course of his regular work at the Trump Organization, Michael Cohen took care of penny ante shit all the time. He would never bother the boss with something pissant like a pornstar payoff for less than a million dollars. So he fronted the cash to Stormy Daniels in October, and they settled up after the election. Sometime during 2017, Trump put Cohen on a $35,000/month retainer fee. And despite the fact that the WSJ broke the Daniels story on January 12, 2018, and Cohen copped to making the payments on Trump's behalf in February, Trump only heard of it "about two weeks ago." This was a campaign expense, but it's cool because Trump paid it back out of his own pocket, so there's no need for further federal investigation.


No consideration! No consideration! You are the no consideration!

Michael Avenatti seems hellbent on proving that Trump knew about the Daniels NDA from the jump. But if he simply wanted to invalidate the agreement, Giuliani just served it up to him on a silver platter. Daniels traded her silence for $130,000 and a promise that Trump wouldn't sue her for talking about it before the deal was inked. Cohen couldn't sign away Trump's right to sue without Trump's knowledge -- he didn't have it to give. So if Trump didn't know about it until April (quit laughing!), the deal is likely invalid.

That's not how campaign finance law works. Like, at all.

You want to know why we're sure Giuliani was winging it? Because Jay Sekulow runs a "charitable foundation" that tiptoes right up to the limits of the law to line his own pockets. (It is really something.) There is no goddamn way he signed off on Rudy Giuliani telling the Washington Post,

Well, the original payment from Cohen was sometime right before the election. The repayments took place over a period of time, probably in 2017, probably all paid back by the end of 2017. That and probably a few other situations that might have been considered campaign expenses.

Here's the Bald Wonder splaining to the Fox Brain Trust this morning that Cohen worked to keep the story quiet during the final days of the campaign.

“Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the last debate with Hillary Clinton,” Giuliani added. “Cohen didn’t even ask. Cohen made it go away. He did his job.”

Giuliani may believe with all his heart that it's totally kosher to give your beloved boss unlimited funds to help his presidential campaign, as long as he pays you back out of his own pocket. BUT THAT'S NOT THE LAW. As Kellyanne Conway's husband helpfully pointed out on Twitter this morning.


Giuliani just admitted to massive campaign finance violations, but let's just pretend for a minute that the $130,000 was Cohen simply advancing money for his true love, Mister Trump. As lawyers do all the time for their clients. (No, they don't.)

Did Mister Trump declare the $130,000 debt on his financial disclosure? He did not.

And how did Cohen get paid back?

GIULIANI: That money was not campaign money. Sorry, I'm giving you a fact now that you don't know. [...]

HANNITY: They funneled it through a law firm.

GIULIANI: Funneled through a law firm, and the president repaid it.


OMG, he actually used the word "funneled."

When I heard Cohen's retainer of $35K when he was doing no work for the president, I said that's how he's repaying it. With a little profit and a little margin for paying taxes.

Soooooo, if we've understood you correctly ... Cohen made a loan to Trump of $130,000. Trump then disguised the repayment as legal fees, which he presumably deducted on his tax return as a business expense. (Tax fraud? Campaign finance violation?) Cohen then voluntarily agreed to take "$460 or $470" (thousand, according to Giuliani) for "legal work," of which he paid approximately $200,000 in state and federal taxes. That left Cohen $150,000 profit (or "campaign expenses," whatever on earth THOSE might be!) after the $130,000 payoff to Daniels. Why, that's even enough money for a first-class ticket to Prague! And because he "was doing no work for the president" after the election, none of their conversations are privileged.

Is that really what you're going with here, Rudy?

Was he aware that Michael incurred expenses to help him? Yes. Did he have an arrangement so that Michael knew he’d be reimbursed for it? Yes. Was the president really wise to take it out of personal funds rather than from campaign funds? Thank God he did, [or else] he’d get a campaign finance violation they’d try to drum up into a felony or something. The president is personally protected.


Follow your FDF on Twitter!

You liking these lawsplainers? Please click here to fund 'em!


Five Dollar Feminist

Your FDF lives in Baltimore under an assumed identity as an upstanding member of the PTA. Shhh, don't tell anyone she makes swears on the internet!

Donate with CC

The producers of your favorite live-action Jack Chick pamphlet, "God's Not Dead" -- you know, the one where the Hercules dude plays an evil philosophy professor who tells all of his students on the first day that they are no longer allowed to believe in god? As all secular professors do? -- have come out with a thrilling new movie, all about how abortion is bad or whatever.

The movie tells the "true" story of Abby Johnson, a former Planned Parenthood clinic worker turned professional anti-choicer. Johnson has been a darling of the forced birth circuit ever since she made up ridiculous and provably false reasons for quitting the Planned Parenthood that was about to fire her for being bad at her job.

Basically, she claims that Planned Parenthood was pushing her to make more abortions happen so they could reel in more dough, and also that she witnessed (for the first time ever!) an ultrasound-guided abortion and saw the baby move from the light and then immediately realized that what she was doing was wrong.

The thing is, however -- no ultrasound-guided abortions were performed on the day she said it happened, and the only reason there was an uptick in abortions at her clinic was because they started offering the abortion pill on a daily basis (and had previously only been performing surgical abortions every other Saturday).

As you may have guessed, the movie does not address any of these things. It also looks very, very bad.

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

Ever since Ruth Bader Ginsburg successfully underwent surgery for lung cancer, conservative sites and message boards have been trafficking in a ridiculous theory that she is actually dead and that there is some kind of Weekend at Bernie's-esque conspiracy to pretend she is still alive.

Now, one would think that her recent public appearance at a concert held in her honor would have put this to rest. Alas, it did not. Rather, the "researchers" (as they hilariously call themselves) determined that the concert was actually her funeral.

No. Really. That was a thing.

I admit that I gave this a lot more thought than I should have. Like, how did they think this would go? How long did they imagine this would go on for? Why would they risk having a full on funeral concert, open to the press? Wouldn't they just have not bothered to have a funeral at all? And what did these people think was going to happen when it was announced that she died for real? Or did they think that we were going to pretend that she is immortal and thus never announce her death? It's so confusing!

Being very up to date on the "RBG is secretly dead!" nonsense, I was very curious about which way the "anons" would go with this when they announced her return to work on Friday. They did not disappoint!

Keep reading... Show less
Donate with CC

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)


©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc