Donate

So here's a twist on the Josh Duggar Saga of Shame and Grossness that's just become clear: Back in 2006, when the Arkansas Department of Human Services was contacted by an anonymous tipster and the family was interviewed by law enforcement, it would have been possible to prosecute young Josh for the offenses that he'd allegedly committed against his sisters in 2002, because Arkansas has an extended statute of limitations on sex crimes against minors. There's just one catch: that extended statute of limitations only applies in cases where the abuse has never been reported to law enforcement. And as we all know far more than we wish we did, the Duggar family did report the alleged abuse to a member of the Arkansas law enforcement community in 2003, a year after it occurred. Conveniently enough, they reported it to a good personal friend, Corporal Joseph T. Hutchens of the Arkansas State Police, the guy who gave young Josh a "stern talking-to" -- and apparently never reported the alleged abuse any further.


Now, as a state trooper, Cpl. Hutchens was a "mandatory reporter" -- legally obliged to follow through on the Duggars' report by reporting it to the Arkansas Child Abuse Hot­line. Because of privacy regulations, the Arkansas Department of Human Services can't confirm whether Hutchens made that call or not, but either way, there was no further action taken in 2003. The 2006 police report by Springdale police detective Darrell Hignite suggests that Hutchens didn't do much of anything, according to Arkansas Online:

Cpl. Hutchins [sic] gave [redacted] a very stern talk about what might happen" if such behavior continued, Jim Bob Duggar's statement to Hignite said.

The corporal told the group of church men that since they "had already put [redacted] through a treatment program, there was nothing else to do."

So, oopsies, no report to the state, case closed.

Therefore, when the Hotline was contacted in 2006 by that anonymous tipster, the fact that the Duggars had already "reported" the allegations meant, conveniently enough, that the new investigation could not result in any charges:

Washington County prosecutor Matt Durrett on Friday cited Arkansas Code 5-1-109 (a) (2), which states: "A prosecution may be commenced for a violation of the following offenses, if, when the alleged violation occurred, the offense was committed against a minor, the violation has not been previously reported to a law enforcement agency or prosecuting attorney, and the victim has not reached the age of twenty-eight (28) years of age."

Since the sexual abuse allegation had been reported in 2003 to a law enforcement officer, no charges could be filed.

[contextly_sidebar id="rN3uNemdgOopwQ5Xqyd4dOIu4mlTu76Y"]

Ta-daa! That's a pretty convenient thing, to have a friend in law enforcement to whom you can "report" your son's sexual crimes, and who'll give him a manly talking-to so he'll never do it again, especially since he conveniently didn't follow through on his legal obligation to report the alleged abuse to the state. We suppose it might tarnish Cpl. Hutchens's reputation as a law enforcement officer that he was later convicted -- in 2012 -- of possessing child pornography in another, unrelated case. Those Duggars sure know how to pick their friends.

[Arkansas Online / WaPo]

Doktor Zoom

Doktor Zoom's real name is Marty Kelley, and he lives in the wilds of Boise, Idaho. He is not a medical doctor, but does have a real PhD in Rhetoric. You should definitely donate some money to this little mommyblog where he has finally found acceptance and cat pictures. He is on maternity leave until 2033. Here is his Twitter, also. His quest to avoid prolixity is not going so great.

$
Donate with CC

The president of the United States called a black woman a "dog" on Twitter Tuesday morning. It is common for folks who pride themselves on their supposed rational "level-headedness" to insist that Donald Trump's Twitter antics are part of some three-dimensional chess-like machinations intended to "distract" us from the Mueller investigation. But despite what Trump might think about my genetic stock, I'm capable of maintaining more than one competing thought in my head.

Sure, there's Russian collusion out the wazoo. Yes, immigrant children are still separated from their parents because of the Trump administration's cruel policies. But I also think whenever we dismiss something Trump does that would be a major story in any other presidency with a mammal chief executive, we help normalize this repulsive behavior.

I've mentioned before that every time Trump whips out his racist bullhorn, the "level-headed" brigade rapidly responds with examples of Trump also being an asshat to white guys and won't someone please think of them? "Doesn't Trump frequently call people dogs? He likes to take a Michael Vick theme to his personal insults." Charles M. Blow, who is more dedicated than I, looked into this claim, and it doesn't appear to be true.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

Morning Wonketariat! Here's some of the things we may be talking about today.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

  • Saturday, Aug 11th ....... Seattle, WA
    Discovery Park, 4-7pm
  • Sunday, Aug 12th ....... Bellingham, WA
    Sunnyland Park, 2-5pm
  • Sunday, Aug 19th ....... Spokane, WA
    Audubon Park, 2-5pm

Read More

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc