Donate

Did Jerry Nadler stutter? Did Attorney General Bill Barr think Nadler was somehow bluffing when he said that if the Mueller report wasn't on his desk by 11:59 PM last night, it would be subpoena-thirty, motherfuckers? Or does Bill Barr just not care, because Bill Barr does not care about the rule of law, and only cares about protecting the rogue presidency of the fuckmouth who hired him?

We are not sure, but Jerry Nadler convened his House Judiciary Committee this morning -- like he said he would -- and they voted to authorize subpoenas for the entire Mueller report, no redactions, no bullshit -- just like he said he would!

This doesn't mean they're issuing subpoenas immediately. It just means that if Barr does not shape up, then all Nadler has to do is press the button, and there will suddenly be subpoenas lodged inside Barr's asshole, because that is how things work in the US and A.


He explained this morning before the committee vote:

A Democratic House Judiciary aide told CNN that part of why they're doing it this way, as opposed to just firing up the subpoena launcher immediately, is so that when they have to go to court, they will be able to say "Look how nice we were, giving DoJ so much time to respond to our requests! NOW FUCKING GIVE IT."

Nadler spoke to reporters shortly after the vote and clarified some things:

Question one: HOW FAST SUBPOENA GONNA LAUNCH INTO BILL BARR'S ASS?

In very short order. I can't say how many days.

Question two: YOU GONNA PUT UP WITH THAT REDACTION BULLSHIT? WILL YOU "NEGOTIATE A MIDDLE GROUND"?

No. The committee must see everything. As was done in every prior instance.

Nadler added that certain things will have to be redacted for public release (GIVE IT, JERRY NADLER!) but that that is the committee's decision, not Barr's. "We make those judgments," said Nadler.

Question three: Will you go to court all by yourself to get the grand jury information, if Barr isn't willing to play ball?

OH, ABSOLUTELY.

Nadler also addressed Republican allegations that this is somehow different from how Democrats acted with the Ken Starr report on Bill Clinton's jizz, because in that case, he said Democrats were fighting to protect certain privacy details from public release, not from letting the House Judiciary Committee see it in the first fucking place.

"In 1998, the debate was not about Congress receiving evidence. Congress had already received the full, 445-page report and 17 boxes of additional documents, including grand jury material," Nadler said. "We are owed that same opportunity today."

Of course, the Republicans on the committee are just so mad about all this. CNN quotes several of them talking at this morning's hearing about how there are Very Important Reasons why their own committee shouldn't be able to see the full unredacted Mueller report and its underlying evidence and intelligence, at least partially because they seem to want to muddy the distinction between what their committee is allowed to see and what the general public is allowed to see:

"He's is expressly forbidden from providing grand jury materials outside the department (with) very limited exceptions. Congress is not one of the exceptions and the chairman knows it," [committee ranking member Doug] Collins said. "The attorney general, although he has been smeared repeatedly, is doing exactly what the regulation says. And for that, congratulations Mr. Attorney General, you get a subpoena." [...]

"The attorney general has promised to provide as much transparency as he possibly can, but I'm afraid that's never going to be good enough for some in here," said Rep. John Ratcliffe, a Texas Republican.

Poor Bill Barr, his hands are just tied! (For more on the GOP's strategy of lying by trying to confuse everybody about the difference between the committee seeing classified/grand jury stuff vs. the public seeing it, check Marcy Wheeler's live-tweeting of this morning's meeting.)

Trump, during the very same Oval Office meeting yesterday where he bellyached about the "oranges" of the Mueller investigation and lied again about where his daddy was born, said "it's hypocrisy and a disgrace!" that Nadler and the Democrats want to read the full, unredacted report, like they're fuckin' members of Congress or something. Yet again, they're all on the same message.

It's almost as if Trump and the rest of these Republican assholes don't want anybody to see what is in Mueller's report, especially not those elected Democrats. Probably because it would just embarrass the Democrats how much it exonerates Donald Trump on cahoots-ing with the Russians to steal the election.

They're clearly scared of something. Oh hey, Lindsey Graham, whatchu doin'? Gonna tell us now why you don't want to see the report, because we should really just trust Bill Barr and OH HEY! SQUIRREL! SQUIRREL THAT COMMITTED EMAIL CRIMES WITH HILLARY CLINTON!

They are fucking freaked.

[CNN]

Follow Evan Hurst on Twitter RIGHT HERE, DO IT RIGHT HERE!

Wonkette is ad-free and funded ONLY by YOU, our dear readers. Click below to keep the lights on, please. We appreciate you, most of the time.

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Evan Hurst

Evan Hurst is the senior editor of Wonkette, which means he is the boss of you, unless you are Rebecca, who is boss of him. His dog Lula is judging you right now.

Follow him on Twitter RIGHT HERE.

$
Donate with CC

Hooray, it's time for yet another dispatch from Fox News's big fun week of failure. (No, we mean even more failure than usual.) While all of Twitter is being annoying and talking incessantly about nothing but Bran and Daenerys and Carl and Peg or whoever they are, we have been (ignoring it and) focusing on all Fox's sadness, starting with Pete Buttigieg's town hall, where he called Fox News a piece of shit to its face. Then we laughed and laughed at Fox News idiot Pete Hegseth, who is sending lots of begging to today's college graduates, that they might immediately get dropped on their heads and forget all their education, so they might grow up to be the Fox News viewers of the future.

Oh, and we haven't even had a chance to LOL at the epic hilarity of Steve Doocy trying to do man-on-the-street interviews in Midtown Manhattan, shoving the mic into the faces of New Yorkers who literally don't care if he goes and plays in traffic. That was fun!

But the point of this post is that we have finally learned what makes at least some Fox News viewers tick, and it is that Tucker Carlson "laughs like a girl." That is not us saying that, that is a Fox News fan lady telling the Washington Post's Erik Wemple why she loves Tucker Carlson so much.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC

Old White Guys Try To Explain Abortion

Throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It's your Sunday show rundown!

popular

Michael is out, so I'm taking over your Sunday Show Rundown. This week everyone was talking about those awful abortion laws worming their way through state legislatures. As usual, most of the men were tripping on their dicks while trying to talk about vag. Luckily, there's enough women around to ladysplain things.

Bernie Sanders went on Meet the Press for the first time in FOREVER and played his greatest hits for all the kids. Sanders criticized Joe Biden's environmental policy (which is literally just "beat Trump"), stating that it wasn't "good enough." Sanders is right! (NO FIGHTING.)

SANDERS: Beating Trump is not good enough. You have to beat the fossil fuel industry, you have to take on all the forces of the status quo who do not want to move this country to energy efficiency and sustainable energy.

But then Chuck Todd asked Bernie a loaded question about women getting "sex-selective" abortions and the whole interview went off the rails. Bernie struggled to answer the dumbass question and came across looking stupid despite having spent the better part of the last week in Alabama railing against abortion bans.

Keep reading... Show less
$
Donate with CC
Donate

How often would you like to donate?

Select an amount (USD)

Newsletter

©2018 by Commie Girl Industries, Inc