"This decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to hold that all insurance-coverage mandates, e.g., for vaccinations or blood transfusions, must necessarily fall if they conflict with an employer’s religious beliefs. Nor does it provide a shield for employers who might cloak illegal discrimination as a religious practice."
Some would look at this part of the decision and think it means all other religio-fruitcase objections are invalid, but if you ask me, this is actually OPENING THE DOOR, arguable that this decision primarily <i>allows any &#039;religious objection&#039;</i> to any other process, simply because that process doesn&#039;t fall into an &quot;insurance-mandate&quot; kind of structure.
I will wager Clarence Thomas&#039; entire interracial porn collection that corporations will be definitely using this decision to fuck more people over, specifically in areas having nothing to do with &quot;insurance mandates&quot; or &quot;illegal discrimination&quot; because &quot;that&#039;s the only thing this decision specifically limited.&quot;
And even more specifically, I&#039;d say this decision will be used to allow any and all &#039;legal discrimination,&#039; only now based on so called religious practices.
It is easy to tell which things are allowed and which aren&#039;t, by the clear language in the decision that says &quot;it is whatever we say it is, today.&quot;
Subsequent decisions will be based on &quot;Because we said so, we&#039;re Supreme Court Justices, the best justices ever. Duh it&#039;s right in our name.&quot;
SCOTUS restored a vital piece our Constitution today [sic]. It&rsquo;s a great day for all <i>Corporation-</i>Americans! [the other sicker sic]
Yes, and how many of the 5 are Catholic? Yep, that&#039;s right. Thomas, Roberts, Scalia, Alito, and Kennedy. All five of them. Nope, Hobby Lobby must LOVE the Catholics.
Yes, my extremely devout Catholic sister-in-law has 3 children, born within 6 or 7 years, well-spaced, and then no more. Suuuure she didn&#039;t use birth control.
<i>&quot;Today the Supreme Court handed our nation a landmark victory for religious liberty. The decision affirms that Americans, contrary to what the Obama Administration attempted to impose, have a right to live and work in accordance to their conscience and can&rsquo;t be forced to surrender their religious freedom once they open a business.&rdquo;</i>
Certainly &quot;their religious freedom&quot; includes Sharia Law, right?
&quot;This decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to hold that all insurance-coverage mandates, e.g., for vaccinations or blood transfusions, must necessarily fall if they conflict with an employer&rsquo;s religious beliefs. Nor does it provide a shield for employers who might cloak illegal discrimination as a religious practice.&quot;
Some would look at this part of the decision and think it means all other religio-fruitcase objections are invalid, but if you ask me, this is actually OPENING THE DOOR, arguable that this decision primarily <i>allows any &#039;religious objection&#039;</i> to any other process, simply because that process doesn&#039;t fall into an &quot;insurance-mandate&quot; kind of structure.
I will wager Clarence Thomas&#039; entire interracial porn collection that corporations will be definitely using this decision to fuck more people over, specifically in areas having nothing to do with &quot;insurance mandates&quot; or &quot;illegal discrimination&quot; because &quot;that&#039;s the only thing this decision specifically limited.&quot;
And even more specifically, I&#039;d say this decision will be used to allow any and all &#039;legal discrimination,&#039; only now based on so called religious practices.
IS[W]YD[T], you [sic]ko!
It is easy to tell which things are allowed and which aren&#039;t, by the clear language in the decision that says &quot;it is whatever we say it is, today.&quot;
Subsequent decisions will be based on &quot;Because we said so, we&#039;re Supreme Court Justices, the best justices ever. Duh it&#039;s right in our name.&quot;
SCOTUS restored a vital piece our Constitution today [sic]. It&rsquo;s a great day for all <i>Corporation-</i>Americans! [the other sicker sic]
Cheney thinks this is a great idea! You mean more no-bid contracts for Halliburton, right?
Yes, and how many of the 5 are Catholic? Yep, that&#039;s right. Thomas, Roberts, Scalia, Alito, and Kennedy. All five of them. Nope, Hobby Lobby must LOVE the Catholics.
Why not both?
Yes, my extremely devout Catholic sister-in-law has 3 children, born within 6 or 7 years, well-spaced, and then no more. Suuuure she didn&#039;t use birth control.
Steel-toed boots. (hugs Weedlord back!)
Those with the gold get to make the rules.
Perhaps Santorum should add a little Preposition H to his frothy mix....
What a lovely start to the week.
Don&#039;t you know that wearing a gold cross around your neck exempts you from any rules you don&#039;t want to follow?
<i>&quot;Today the Supreme Court handed our nation a landmark victory for religious liberty. The decision affirms that Americans, contrary to what the Obama Administration attempted to impose, have a right to live and work in accordance to their conscience and can&rsquo;t be forced to surrender their religious freedom once they open a business.&rdquo;</i>
Certainly &quot;their religious freedom&quot; includes Sharia Law, right?
At this point a few Daleks would probably be a quick mercy.
I see we can add &quot;bragging when your side wins&quot; to the list of things that IOKIYAR.