312 Comments

Sure, life expectancy at birth for the whole population is always totally representative of that of the elite.

That's why there's such a close relationship between Carson's 47 and the age at which the first Chief Justice, John Jay, died (83). Of course, Jay only sat on the bench for 6 years before resigning to run for Governor of New York, but that has nothing to do with life expectancy.

Clearly all the Founding Fathers were dead and buried long before John Marshall served 34 years as Chief Justice and it's only for that reason they didn't do anything about the possibility that a life appointment could mean a long time. Oh, wait, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were alive the first 25 years of his term. Huh! Obviously John Adams wasn't paying attention, I mean it's not like he appointed the guy or anything... OR IS IT? (Yes, it is).

Expand full comment

I don't know whether Carson's cited life expectancy of 47 is accurate, but if it is that was average for everybody, certainly not average for Supreme Court Justices. The average life span of Washington's original 5 Justices was almost 69 years old. John Jay lived to 83, and William Cushing served for over 20 years. And the issue of lifetime appointments isn't that big of a deal considering in the last 60 years, only Scalia and Rehnquist have died in office while 17 other Justices have retired or resigned.

Expand full comment

If your head is in the oven and your feet are in the freezer....

Expand full comment

Which, as I recall, means he lived until well after the Great Flood.

Expand full comment

CT: A+. I come to the not-allowed comments for my daily dose of smart people, and you have certainly filled today's quota.

Expand full comment

Now you've not only embarrassed me, but made me feel I'll never live up to my past - I'll be the Pierre Salinger of (non-existent) commenters! :-)

Expand full comment

Actually, that would be rebecca at wonkette etc.

Expand full comment

Thank you, thank you very much. And Shy fixed the thing, which I knew he would once he knew about it.

Expand full comment

The rate of infant and child mortality was much higher back then, so if you count children under the age of 16, then yeah, it brings down the average quite a bit. In the 18th and 19th centuries, if you survived childhood (when your immune system is immature) and reached adulthood (when it was much stronger) then you could look forward to a life that was nearly as long as the average today. Carson (a doctor!) is so Totally A Idiot for not recognizing this.

Expand full comment

The Assassination of Antonin Scalia, by Rachel Maddow, and her girlfriend from Planned Parenthood.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the tip!

Expand full comment

Right; and childbirth deaths, very common throughout history, have to be factored in too. In every era life expectancy is heavily influenced by social class. In late 1800s and early 1900s; before all those evil librl plots that hamstrung the Job Creators, the average life expectancy for a lower-class factory worker was somewhere in the early 40s. I had a lot of great-aunts growing up but few great-uncles: two generations before a lot of family members were miners and because the Gubber Mint didn't interfere with the profits of the owners, few of my great-uncles lived past 40.

Expand full comment

And at that, he had to have attended math class before schools started scorching childrens' brains by allowing them to use calculators in said class.

Expand full comment

I'm not sure a campaign to force the Notorious RBG to step down would exactly catch fire here.

Expand full comment

Excellent point about the social class factor.

Expand full comment

So your secret is to offload your garbage on us. I approve of that. Please give me a green card, i live in the rocky mountains and love cold weather...

Expand full comment