Well, that's problematic because defense attorneys are supposed to provide "zealous representation" of their client's interest no matter how repulsive they are.
I was under the impression he didn't give testimony because he's had enough experience in court to know how easily it can blow up in a defendant's face.
You are extremely stupid, stupid.
You're not fooling anyone, stupid.
I hope that Chauvin is convicted and that every book he reads for the rest of his life be missing its final chapter.
Keep digging, you are almost out of the hole!
I'm amazed at the depth of your vocabulary.
The bit before "because" does not logically follow from the bit after. You're like one of those birds that is named after the sound it makes.
You are stupid. Thanks for the proof, stupid.
Poor stupid you.
kkkluxboi central really failed on that talking point, stupid.
Isn't it a thing that defendants should almost never take the stand in their own defense, because it's going to end badly for them?
And even guilty people are allowed to invoke the fifth.
It's jarring to read a defense of all things "English" expressed in such a shambles of the English language.
In non-vehicular situations.
Do not identify yourself. I do not carry identification, they would have to place me under arrest to legally obtain prints for I.D.
NEVER allow a search of your body, home, possessions, without a warrant.
I don’t answer questions!
Am I free to go?
Am I under arrest? Yes? I will not say anything more until I have an attorney present. No? Am I free to go?
Am I being detained? Same as above for arrest.
There is NOTHING that you can say to a cop that will help you. They will try everything to entrap you. Be calm, polite, courteous and mute.
NEVER call the police. There is nothing so dire happening that they will not screw-it-up worse.
I do not answer questions is the strongest tool in your kit other than video and audio which should be rolling ALWAYS!
Best guess, to preserve an opportunity for appeal if there's some procedural foul-up with, for example, jury instructions on the matter.
Well, that's problematic because defense attorneys are supposed to provide "zealous representation" of their client's interest no matter how repulsive they are.
I was under the impression he didn't give testimony because he's had enough experience in court to know how easily it can blow up in a defendant's face.