202 Comments

In Jayapal's version at least, the subsidies would use existing Treasury and IRS mechanisms for delivery, but they'd be funded through congressional appropriations, not out of Social Security. And it includes oversight to make sure workers get the funds.

Expand full comment

Not sure about Hawley's version, but Jayapal's funds it separately. Can't see it working otherwise.

Expand full comment

Jayapal specifies that to get it, companies would have to retain and rehire workers.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I trust (most) Democrats to not be stupid/evil about it. I am... less sure about Republicans.

Expand full comment

The other thing about this is that since the government is going to be, in effect, paying these employees, the taxes on the profits should be raised so that the money is distributed throughout the community rather than just put into a charter school or whatever the company wants to use to funnel the money.

Expand full comment

Yes, that is stupid and obviously wrong. Which may be why I learned about it as a recession tool, to present it in a way that wasn't quite so obviously wrong, back when Republicans and Libertarians tried to at least pretend the things they said had any connection to reality.

Expand full comment

Fox News's ugly little brother, Fox Business ...

What's that make OANN? The crazy cousin who's been kept locked in a closet?

Expand full comment

And he keeps sneaking out and creeping on your friends when they come over.

Expand full comment

Several lifetimes ago I think.

Expand full comment

Geez it’s like you’re not even listening...they aren’t “sending payments,” they’re “negativizing disincentives.”

Expand full comment

Methinks this was cut off just before the bloodshed, to keep it suitable for small children and Wonkers.

Expand full comment

Permanent UBI is precisely what is needed.

Expand full comment

I doubt Ivanka's shoe collection is up to Imelda's standards, but otherwise agreed.

Expand full comment

bull market, no?

Expand full comment