225 Comments
User's avatar
-=|Seriously, ☑️|=-'s avatar

You are cold. I like you.

Expand full comment
-=|Seriously, ☑️|=-'s avatar

I’ve been solicited many times, and there was never a ballot box involved.

Expand full comment
DrBDH's avatar

Very, very, very, very badly. Sinema, Manchin, name your price. What do you want? More than just one of the Four Corners, Arizona? - you got it (sorry, Utah). More west, West Virginia? -which do you prefer, Kentucky or Ohio?

Expand full comment
Wookie Monster's avatar

We can give Manchin those Virginia counties that want to secede.

Expand full comment
dshwa's avatar

And fucking obvious too. Even Judge Coathanger Barrett could see the intent of that one.

Expand full comment
Lefty Wright's avatar

But it's doubtful she would object. When they don't care if you stand in lines to vote for hours during a pandemic, they are not going to worry about people passing out from dehydration. Of course, the courts made special provisions for hearings and deliberations in the courtroom during the pandemic. Their health and lives are important. Voters' health and lives, not so much.

Expand full comment
carovee's avatar

Hey, hey now, spare a little love for WI, where the GOP controlled legislature is trying to limit absentee voting and mail in ballots, eliminate ballot collection boxes and ban municipal ballot collection in the park events.

Expand full comment
carovee's avatar

Can't we just pull one from the GOP playbook and threaten to primary Sinema and Manchin unless they fall in line.

Expand full comment
carovee's avatar

They can afford to stiff rural voters because who are rural voters gonna turn to? The democrats? Pfffft.

Expand full comment
sarafina's avatar

And we did win, so moving forward. That's how it works. If Synema and Manchin don't vote with us, might as well have GOPs.

Expand full comment
malsperanza's avatar

No, the whole entire point is that beyond their actual Senate votes, they deliver a host of crucially important benefits that are the exact opposite of "might as well have GOPs."

Because, indeed, that's how it works.

Expand full comment
just_jim's avatar

I expect to be arrested in Georgia in 2022.If I am, as Thoreau reportedly said “Why are you not here?”

Expand full comment
just_jim's avatar

No.Compare Manchin's voting record with Murkowski's.Who would you rather have as the crucial vote.If it isn't Manchin, I have to question your judgement. And if we gain one Democratic senator in 2022, it's Sinema's record vs Manchin we depend on. And two senators it's the next senator to the left of Sinema.Each additional Democrat moves the crucial vote one senator to the left.

Expand full comment
Cliff Hendroval's avatar

Didn't realize that Perdue was that old. At that age, being a frosh senator is ridiculous.

Expand full comment
Zyxomma's avatar

Ta, Liz. Republicans: When they can't win, they cheat.

Expand full comment
JCfromNC's avatar

Yes -- they want Republicans to be the one person and to have the one Republican vote. Non-Republican votes cause issues when they have to be counted, so best to see to it that they're never cast in the first place.

Expand full comment