Unless it can be shown that she had the inside knowledge that an insurrection was planned rather than a rally then it is protected activity. Her e-mails are certainly hopeful in that regard but they also go far beyond that - like sending Biden and his whole family to Gitmo - and so really are ravings rather than blueprints and - critically - do not show logistical involvement.
I understand that Wonkers are angry at her but there is much more attention paid to her here than at the Committee or the DOJ, and they are in an actual position to know if she is more than just a shiny object.
Subpoenas. Multiple. One for Ginni one for Cleta Mitchell, and one for ANYBODY mentioned by a previous witness during testimony which has been publicly disputed or denied on mainstream or social media. You know, there IS a way to get to the bottom of all the wacky things that "people are saying.." It has something to do with an oath and a penalty for perjury.
"...We're proud to be oviesfrom Muscovy..."
Unless it can be shown that she had the inside knowledge that an insurrection was planned rather than a rally then it is protected activity. Her e-mails are certainly hopeful in that regard but they also go far beyond that - like sending Biden and his whole family to Gitmo - and so really are ravings rather than blueprints and - critically - do not show logistical involvement.
I understand that Wonkers are angry at her but there is much more attention paid to her here than at the Committee or the DOJ, and they are in an actual position to know if she is more than just a shiny object.
That's all I have on this.
also, cannibal!
Psychopaths are good at mimicking normals.
A heifer is a female bovine which has not been bred. You seem very dumb.
Subpoenas. Multiple. One for Ginni one for Cleta Mitchell, and one for ANYBODY mentioned by a previous witness during testimony which has been publicly disputed or denied on mainstream or social media. You know, there IS a way to get to the bottom of all the wacky things that "people are saying.." It has something to do with an oath and a penalty for perjury.
Apt. Too bad it’s a little too long to go on a T-shirt.
Doesn't matter. The proprietors at this blog rule against that style of insult.
Do you want to continue posting here, or not?
Please review the rules, item #5
— Dok Zoom, Yr Friendly Neighborhood Comments Moderator
Please review the rules, particularly item #5.
— Dok Zoom, Yr Friendly Neighborhood Comments Moderator
Laughing!
The Supreme Court has always refused to adopt an ethics code. Justices like Thomas make me understand why.
Ginni Thomas could not pass the bar and hasn't tried to retake the exam.
Both billionaires.
I did, but only straight from the outdoor sauna.