If you're white, it's calle a "celebration." Which might get "out of hand." Not to be confused with a "riot", which might get "violent."
One calls for cops and barricades to "keep things under control", the other calls for tear gas, armored vehicles, and rubber bullets.
It should be noted that the distinctions here are a <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tulsa_race_riot" target="_blank">relatively modern development. </a>
I have low expectations for the announcement - I mean, how zealous was the system, in the person of the prosecuting attorney, really going to be? For them that wants to watch it happen: news.blogs.nytimes.com/2014...
My fantasy is that the local residents decide to be more civilzed than the cops have been. Sadly, my hopes on that score aren&#039;t very high either. (I wonder if the cops out there will get the word in advance... it&#039;ll be interesting to see if they make any moves in advance of the public announcement.)
can&#039;t say I&#039;m surprised. Now it&#039;s time for the media to focus on every bit of controversy they can gin up and declare that the uppity blahs are rioting
Exactly. Grand juries indict 9 times out of 10 - they are rubber stamps for prosecutors. So in this case presumably the prosecutor signaled that he didn&#039;t want an indictment.
they need Nixon&#039;s head from Futurama
should have bought a bunch of those forever stamps
If you&#039;re white, it&#039;s calle a &quot;celebration.&quot; Which might get &quot;out of hand.&quot; Not to be confused with a &quot;riot&quot;, which might get &quot;violent.&quot;
One calls for cops and barricades to &quot;keep things under control&quot;, the other calls for tear gas, armored vehicles, and rubber bullets.
SEA MONKEY LIBUL!!1!
It should be noted that the distinctions here are a <a href="http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tulsa_race_riot" target="_blank">relatively modern development. </a>
Looks more like a splooge gun.
I have low expectations for the announcement - I mean, how zealous was the system, in the person of the prosecuting attorney, really going to be? For them that wants to watch it happen: news.blogs.nytimes.com/2014...
My fantasy is that the local residents decide to be more civilzed than the cops have been. Sadly, my hopes on that score aren&#039;t very high either. (I wonder if the cops out there will get the word in advance... it&#039;ll be interesting to see if they make any moves in advance of the public announcement.)
Not promising . . . this sounds like a justification for a &quot;no indictment&quot; decision, right from the first sentence.
can&#039;t say I&#039;m surprised. Now it&#039;s time for the media to focus on every bit of controversy they can gin up and declare that the uppity blahs are rioting
Get ready for Michael Brown to be villified as a thug, a punk, and a criminal. Damn these people.
100 bottles? I&#039;ll be right over...
Most reporters wouldn&#039;t recognize a pointed question if you jabbed them in the ass with one.
along with the rest of the community
Are they, by any chance, &quot;on the wall&quot;?
Exactly. Grand juries indict 9 times out of 10 - they are rubber stamps for prosecutors. So in this case presumably the prosecutor signaled that he didn&#039;t want an indictment.
WHAT A SURPRISE.
Well, we can be sure that Darren Wilson is not a ham sandwich.