156 Comments

Seems very much like Romney is dividing America into those who have quiet rooms to talk in, and those who should shut the fuck up.

If you have kids, and fewer than four mansions, I think we all know you don't have a quiet room.

Expand full comment

Yeah, someone ought to explain to Romney that Dickens was exposing a horror not celebrating a virtue, and that the anglo saxons who stuck it out in the home country have moved on from that shit.

Expand full comment

Maximilien Robespierre, your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

Expand full comment

Maximilien Robespierre. your ideas are intrіguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

Expand full comment

And if they object, we can always threaten them with <em>the comfy chair!</em>

Expand full comment

Probably the least accurate possible formulation.

United Kingdom = United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland = Britain = England+Wales+Scotland+Northern Ireland = what Parliament has authority over.

Great Britain = England+Wales+Scotland. There is no governmental unit with authority over all these places and no others.

Calling any one of England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland a nation wouldn't be completely wrong, but it certainly wouldn't be a full explanation of their status. The UK is really the country in the way it's normally understood.

But, they do confuse things by identifying themselves in sporting events as "GBR", and their currency is listed as "GBP".

Still, you'd have thought that if you were going on a foreign trip with the intention of proving that you'd still be OK on foreign policy despite having <em>absolutely no experience whatsoever</em> on that front, you might do a little thing called "research".

Expand full comment

Yes indeed. A bumpy upfist for it. In a good way, of course.

Expand full comment

Given the prodigious amount of lying strictly for personal gain involved in the first alternative, doesn't it imply the second?

Expand full comment

<blockquote> you can never be tinny enough</blockquote>

I propose a vat of molten tin and a Mitt-dip to test this theory...

Expand full comment

More like a pantomime roar of "Oh no we won't"

Expand full comment

He should have been more like Mr. Bean, and kept his stupid mouth shut.

Expand full comment

What, the curtains?

Expand full comment

The reverse Galt?

Expand full comment

I was using the term "nation" in the sense that I learned it in Poli Sci 101 a hundred years ago: a geographical area with a population sharing a common history and socio-cultural background. Differentiated from a "state", which is a political / governmental unit. In my way of looking at things, England, Scotland, Ireland, and maybe Wales are "nations". The UK is a state (as is the US).

In any case, as you point out, Great Britain is neither.

Also, I'm not certain, but I think the reason they use GBR may be because in the Olympics, athletes from Northern Ireland can choose to belong to either Team GBR or Team IRL. (In things like the World Cup, they dispense with the GB stuff, and field sides from England, Scotland, Wales, etc.)

Expand full comment

Not sure about the Northern Ireland part... the British Olympic Association describes itself as \"the National Olympic Commttee for Great Britain and Northern Ireland\". It seems more likely to be due to the fact they've been competing as GBR since the first modern olympics, which was, of course, prior to Irish independence (although back then they were \"The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, but they weren't exactly known for giving a crap about the Irish).

Expand full comment

can i come to your party?

Expand full comment