On the one hand, municipal and state offices are the right places for third parties to try to establish themselves. On the other hand, I do wish the leftie third-partiers (e.g., Greens) would at least consider passing up <i>tight</i> races where they know they&#039;re only gonna get a few per cent.
There is some merit to the argument that many of their votes may come from folks who would not otherwise vote for either the D or the R. But <i>some</i> of their votes would otherwise have gone to a major party candidate, and it is extremely likely that the loss from the D side is greater than the loss from the R.
I&#039;m always a bit amazed at how many third party voters insist that there is no difference between the major parties. It&#039;s almost like they have to believe that in order to justify their third-party affiliation.
&quot;I would not have used the words that were there.&quot;
--MItt Romney
Stand with him where? On the deck of his boat? The front porch of his home in NH/MA/CA? The lobby of the Post Office in the Cayman Islands?
Like the Old Man of the Mountain, he&#039;s a NH fixture that crashed to the ground years ago. Efforts to restore either one are futile.
Well played, sir. Well played!
Wasn&#039;t Sununu the vacuum cleaner in &#039;Teletubbies&#039;?
Moscato? You&#039;d have to be on your third bottle, and flying solo.
Horses are corporations too, my friend.
Seriously, how the fuck do you deduct the cost of feeding a goddam dancing horse?
&quot;Heals&quot; is a perfectly good word, and it&#039;s spelt rite.
It&#039;s the same thing Rushbo did about Sandra Fluke. &quot;Sorry that those words offended you, you oversensitive commie&quot;.
Mitt probably just wants to propose a <strike>Mutually</strike> Mormonly Beneficial Arrangement.
He used the words that were there in his head -- and he&#039;s oblivious to the problem presented by the fact that they were there at all.
That&#039;s right.
On the one hand, municipal and state offices are the right places for third parties to try to establish themselves. On the other hand, I do wish the leftie third-partiers (e.g., Greens) would at least consider passing up <i>tight</i> races where they know they&#039;re only gonna get a few per cent.
There is some merit to the argument that many of their votes may come from folks who would not otherwise vote for either the D or the R. But <i>some</i> of their votes would otherwise have gone to a major party candidate, and it is extremely likely that the loss from the D side is greater than the loss from the R.
I&#039;m always a bit amazed at how many third party voters insist that there is no difference between the major parties. It&#039;s almost like they have to believe that in order to justify their third-party affiliation.
Congrats on your first kilocomment.
And baseball teams, too. Mitt relates to baseball.
I guess that might be a shade worse than the $77,000 tax deduction for dressage horse expenses: <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/sto..." target="_blank">" rel="nofollow noopener" title="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/06/18/1100947/...">http://www.dailykos.com/sto...
Who do you mean?