Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Art Moak's avatar

This has been known for decades. The only difference here is a live witness and participant. The Russians approached Harry Truman to work a deal with him. Harry spoke to them plainly. They offered Ike support. They offered Adlai support. Barry turned them down. No word on Tricky Dick, (red flag). Dick did the same thing with Madame Chiang kai-shek to get the North to quit the peace talks that had just had a breakthrough and wait for big Dick to get elected. Ronnie and Iran, Bush Sr and the contra, Bill and a BJ, Bush Jr and Iraq, Afghanistan. It started with Nixon and has gotten worse each cycle.

Expand full comment
Old flintlock's avatar

When I was in the Air Force I was sent to Iran on TDY and helped train Iranian pilots here in the states. This was of course, when the Shah was still in power. It was my first experience in a repressive police state. As a result as have remained interested in Iranian affairs.Years later I made friends with an Iranian doctor. He grew up a few miles from the Desert One site. He said American planes were routinely flying in for months before the plane and helicopter crash. He added it was common knowledge that the US was flying personnel in and out at the time. He identified several types of US aircraft that were routinely seen on the ground. The Iranian side of the story is that the hostages were actually training the Iranians on operating radar and listening equipment which was monitoring the Russians. Neither side, for obvious domestic political reasons could admit this. I was and remain skeptical but I have never been able to disprove any if it either. Saleem said, when the planes and helicopters collided, it blew the covert operations cover, requiring a cover story of a rescue mission. He correctly noted that none of the hostages (as of that time) had ever written about their captivity, been widely interviewed or said much of anything publicly. A few years after the Desert One incident I happened to meet one of the Marines held in Iran and he would not really speak much about it. Which makes sense to me based on Saleems story. In summary, the story is the whole "hostage" situation was a set up by the US and Iranian government to transfer classified equipment to the Iranians and give them time to be trained in its use. Neither side could admit this so the hostage story was set up as cover. Once Reagan was pending inaugeration the Americans were returned due to both parties being afraid there would be leaks. I am not sure what the facts really are and the story seems far fetched but considering our governments predilection for lying to the public, I would not be surprised if it isn't true. For example Vietnam, Iraq and countless other situations.

Expand full comment
298 more comments...

No posts