Discussion about this post

User's avatar
paul's avatar

After 23 years of service, I can confidently say that Hegseth is straight up lying about females in service/combat. He is lying. And people believe him.

At this rate, our military effectiveness will suffer. I guarantee it.

Expand full comment
[Redacted]'s avatar

As a guy with two years in military communications, and an adult life paying attention to the military, it is my opinion that your man Pete Hegseth does not understand the nature of the military. In the alternative, he does not understand the American model.

Individual valor, while highly praised in theory, was written out of American militarism in practice because the industrial model was more effective at winning wars. We learned this lesson in the Civil War.

Yes, we need troops in good physical condition, just like we need people in good physical condition at final assembly in any enterprise. But what makes American troops effective is the ability to deliver an unprecedented array of ordnance at just about any objective, on demand, at any time. Individual valor isn’t the point. What makes it work is coordinated group effort put forth by troops who have been trained to work together, no matter what havoc is going on around them. Doesn’t make any difference what sex you are or what your sexual preference is. War in the field isn’t a beauty contest. Helps if you have experience with the conditions on the ground and with the equipment. If they can work together, without flying off into a panic, turning tail and running, they can, while working together as they have been trained, deliver overwhelming force to any objective.

Expand full comment
386 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?